The Fedz - Print 2 Earn
  • Stability Under Stress: The Fedz's Innovative Approach
  • Improving Upon Previous Attempts
  • Tokenomics
  • FUSD - The Fedz Synthetic Dollar
    • Private Liquidity Pool
      • Example: Private Liquidity Pools & Open Market Liquidity Pools
      • Example: Navigating Market Fluctuations in "The Fedz" Ecosystem
  • sbFUSD, Staking, and Printing FUSD: The Stability Engine of TheFedz
  • The Fedz Elements and Rules
    • How to Join The Fedz
    • The Fedz Game
    • Rule Book
  • The Fedz: A New Approach to Studying Bank Runs in Field Conditions
    • Invitation to Researchers
  • Background on Bank Stability
    • Academic Research and The Fedz Context
      • Kiss et al. (2012) on Deposit Insurance and Observability
      • Demirgüc-Kunt and Detragiache (2002) on Deposit Insurance and Market Discipline
      • Demirgüc-Kunt and Huizinga (2004) on Market Discipline
      • Madies (2006) on Partial Deposit Insurance
      • Schotter and Yorulmazer (2009) on Observability and Insurance
      • Preventing (panic) bank runs Hubert J. Kiss 2022
      • William A. Branch eta al (2022) on Noise and Sunspots in Financial Models
      • Andolfatto (2017) on Preventing Bank Runs
      • Diamond and Dybvig meet money: Are deposit contracts efficient after all? (D. Rivero, H. Rodrıguez)
      • Starr and Yilmaz (2007) on Social Networks
      • Jacklin (1987) on Investment Technology
      • Leveraging Axelrod's (1984) Game Theory for Enhanced Cooperation in The Fedz
    • Key hypothesis & Research Terms
      • Dynamic Reward System (After-Tax) in The Fedz Ecosystem
      • Isolated Decision-Making in The Fedz Ecosystem
      • Decentralized Clearinghouse and Governance in The Fedz Ecosystem
      • Decentralized Bailout in The Fedz Ecosystem
      • Privileged Access and Sustained Stability in The Fedz
    • Contributions to Future Research
    • TBD - ZK for keeping the NFT player choice and deal with it together at the end of the round.
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Introduction
  • Conceptual Framework of Isolated Decision-Making
  • Implementation in The Fedz Ecosystem
  • Solving Coordination Issues
  • Expected Effects on Financial Stability
  • Conclusion
  1. Background on Bank Stability
  2. Key hypothesis & Research Terms

Isolated Decision-Making in The Fedz Ecosystem

Introduction

The Fedz ecosystem employs an isolated decision-making process to enhance financial stability and resolve coordination issues. This approach is influenced by the findings of Kiss, Rodriguez-Lara, and Rosa-Garcia (2022), who demonstrated the effectiveness of structured communication and depositor linkages in preventing bank runs. By understanding how individual decisions are influenced by the actions of others, The Fedz can create a more stable and resilient financial environment.

Conceptual Framework of Isolated Decision-Making

In traditional financial systems, the actions of one depositor can trigger a cascade of withdrawals, leading to a bank run. The research by Kiss, Rodriguez-Lara, and Rosa-Garcia (2022) highlights the importance of structured communication and the visibility of other depositors' actions in preventing such runs. By structuring the decision-making process and creating clear lines of communication, financial stability can be significantly improved.

Implementation in The Fedz Ecosystem

Structured Communication and Decision Line

In The Fedz, stakers (analogous to depositors) are organized in a structured line where each staker’s actions can be observed by subsequent stakers. This setup mimics the experimental design used by Kiss et al., where the order of decisions and the visibility of actions played crucial roles in maintaining stability. Key elements include:

  1. Visibility of Actions: Stakers can observe the actions of those before them in the decision line, reducing uncertainty and panic-induced decisions.

  2. Sequential Decision-Making: Decisions are made sequentially, with each staker’s choice being influenced by the observed actions of previous stakers.

  3. Communication of Intentions: Stakers can signal their intentions to hold or increase their stakes, fostering confidence and reducing the likelihood of mass withdrawals.

Solving Coordination Issues

The isolated decision-making process addresses coordination problems by ensuring that stakers have the necessary information to make informed decisions. By observing the actions of others and understanding their intentions, stakers can coordinate their actions to prevent destabilizing behaviors. This structured approach mitigates the risk of panic and promotes a stable financial environment.

Expected Effects on Financial Stability

The isolated decision-making process in The Fedz ecosystem is expected to enhance financial stability through the following mechanisms:

  1. Reduced Panic Withdrawals: By providing visibility into the actions of other stakers, the system reduces the likelihood of panic-induced withdrawals.

  2. Enhanced Confidence: The ability to communicate intentions and observe the decisions of others fosters a sense of collective confidence, encouraging stakers to maintain or increase their stakes.

  3. Improved Coordination: Structured communication and sequential decision-making enable better coordination among stakers, reducing the risk of destabilizing runs.

Conclusion

The isolated decision-making process in The Fedz ecosystem draws on the experimental findings of Kiss, Rodriguez-Lara, and Rosa-Garcia to create a more stable and resilient financial environment. By structuring the decision-making process and enhancing communication among stakers, The Fedz addresses coordination issues and mitigates the risk of panic-induced withdrawals. This approach aligns with the principles of transparency and collective decision-making that underpin The Fedz ecosystem, ensuring a robust and stable financial system.

PreviousDynamic Reward System (After-Tax) in The Fedz EcosystemNextDecentralized Clearinghouse and Governance in The Fedz Ecosystem

Last updated 1 year ago